Now that I am over the Heiney flu (H1N1) and I no longer have kidney stones (added insult to injury and it took from 9:15am to 4:30pm to have them removed) and I am back at work after spending 3 weeks in a drug induced fog, I am back at my keyboard, and ready to tackle various library problems and other topics of interest.
First thing is a
lovely rant on curation and curators by @mikecane. I'm not sure I agree with all of his points, but I agree with some of them. Particularly:
Upwards of ninety-percent of the books I have read in my pre-Internet life were based on this:
1) Stumbling upon the book in a store
2) Stumbling upon the book in a public library
3) A passing mention in a non-fiction article
4) Having another writer mention the book
Where is the “curation” in any of that? Half were chance encounters, half were also chance encounters with mentions by others. There was no Curator tapping me on the shoulder to get my attention.
And in this Internet Age? It’s come down to number 4 — writers recommending other writers — and a new one, number 5: readers mentioning books.